Past Papers · Using past papers
How Many 0606 Past Papers Should You Do?
Written by Rig, our founder
8 years teaching IGCSE & SPM maths · Updated 16 August 2026
Parents often ask for a number, and there isn’t a meaningful one. “Do twenty past papers” is the wrong target, because a paper’s value lives entirely in how it is used, not in the fact of completing it. A better question is: how many papers can your child properly mark, review, and act on before the exam? That number is the real budget.
Why quantity is the wrong metric
A past paper produces value in three stages: doing it, marking it honestly, and fixing what it reveals. Only the third stage raises the grade. A student who races through paper after paper, glancing at the score and moving on, is stuck at stage one, doing the most work for the least return.
Ten papers taken to stage three, each one marked against the scheme with every lost mark logged and addressed, will move a grade far more than thirty papers abandoned at stage one. The error log is what makes stage three happen, and reviewing properly takes at least as long as sitting the paper. Budget for that.
A realistic shape
Rather than a raw count, think in terms of coverage and phasing:
- Topic questions, ongoing from when each topic is taught, this is high-volume but low-cost, a handful of questions per topic as you go.
- Full timed papers in the final two months: enough to cover both Paper 1 and Paper 2 across several sessions, with time between them to review and fix. For most students that is roughly one full paper a week in the run-up, each fully reviewed, not one a day skimmed.
The exact figure matters less than the rule: never do the next paper until you have reviewed the last one. If reviewing is falling behind, do fewer papers, not more.
The diminishing return, and the exception
Past a point, extra papers stop teaching you new things, you have met the question types, and further papers just confirm what your log already says. That is the signal to shift from new papers to redoing the ones that exposed weaknesses, a few weeks on, to check the fixes held. A recurring error on a redo means the fix didn’t land and needs a different approach, often the point where a specialist’s eye helps.
The honest answer to “how many”: enough that you have seen every question type and closed your recurring leaks, and not one more done carelessly. A trial class can tell you which stage your child is actually at. Message us on WhatsApp to book.